The difference between Hyung Jin and Dan Fefferman is the difference between black and white, good and evil, God and Satan. I believe Mother, Andrew Wilson, and the rest of the FFWPU are in sync with Dan’s egalitarian philosophy that he pushes everyday at this forum. Dan and company are politically correct. They have the majority of America on their side. Maybe the majority of the world. They definitely have Europe on their side. Hyung Jin is politically incorrect and has a minority of America on his side. He is correct when he says men are called by God to be the Kings of their castles as taught in Ephesians 5 and this“makes people mad.” Traditional family values are deeply offensive to feminist Dan and company.
For thousands of years no one ever thought women would be police officers and soldiers. Mankind may be fallen and Satan is the ruler of this world but God has been able to get some men and women to understand his divine principles for mankind. They have written books and now we even have videos of God’s messengers. We have videos of the Messiah saying that Hyung Jin is his successor. We have videos of Hyung Jin that has transformed my life and the lives of many others. The books, articles, blogs, and videos that Andrew Wilson has are Satan’s lies. Dan and company are Satan’s ambassadors. The forces of darkness. They fight human nature. They fight natural law. They fight common sense. Those who live by their ideology eventually crash and burn. They are on a road paved to hell with good intentions. God’s design for men and women is not only taught by Hyung Jin and Yeonah but they walk their talk. Mankind can see what a true Unificationist couple looks like. I have been doing a lot of crying for the last 10 months since I saw the January 18, 2015 YouTube video of Hyung Jin’s sermon “Breaking the Silence.” I finally have a Unificationist role model for a true man. Mankind has a Constitution from two brothers who have restored Cain and Abel. It is just a matter time now. The FFWPU will eventually fade away like K-Mart and Sanctuary will be like Walmart. K-Mart used to be king but now Walmart is.
Yesterday Hyung Jin gave another outstanding sermon “Good vs. Evil Blood (11/22/15). Mankind has a black and white decision to make. Either he is right or Dan is right. There is no gray. I believe Hyung Jin is right in comparing the two camps in this cultural war to the difference between r-types and K-types. He says, “Feminism. r-types promote hostility towards men. They promote masculine traits amongst women and promote feminine traits amongst men.” Dan is incapable of seeing pictures of dead and wounded women police officers and soldiers and feeling shame. He feels inspired. I have posted another dead woman police officer today. Gail Cobb. She was 24-years-old when she was shot to death. She was an American police officer from Washington, D.C., who was the first female police officer in the United States shot and killed while patrolling in the line of duty. “While walking her beat, she was tipped off that a suspected bank robber had just fled into a nearby underground parking garage. Officer Cobb located the man and instructed him to place his hands on the wall. As she radioed for assistance, the suspect spun around and fired a single shot at point-blank range. The bullet went through her wrist and her police radio and then penetrated her heart. She died at the scene. She is survived by her child.”
This single mom died a violent death in 1974. To Dan and company she is a pioneer feminist who we should applaud. This was the time when Father had come to America and started speaking on his Day of Hope tours. Satan made sure that America was a feminist nation that would reject a strong man who had a wife that looked like the epitome of the biblical Ephesians 5 marriage. Father often chastised American women for being tom boys and criticized men for being weak. This was the time of the women’s liberation movement that is a misnomer. Satan takes good words and deceives everyone. It was the women’s enslavement movement. It was a movement of death. It is the reason Gail Cobb met a violent death while her baby was being taken care of by someone else so she could take a job away from a man for some insane principle of gender equality. Father tried to educate American sisters to stop being so subjective. He said the brothers want more feminine women like Japanese. Sadly his followers embraced feminism and Andrew even says Father is a feminist and the ideology of the women’s federation movement is the basic thought of the Completed Testament Age.
Hyung Jin says the men at FF are feminized. They try to get women into the Army Rangers. They live, he says, in a world of fantasy. Hyung Jin lives in a world of reality.
This is getting long but if you are in the mood to do some more reading here is an article by the brilliant Ann Coulter about the little grandmother who was severely brain damaged while being a police officer that I wrote about yesterday in my post titled “Dan Fefferman is wrong about women cops.” I guess we have to understand that Dan is unable to see her logic and truth because he is an r-type person. What Ann says will make sense to K-type people.
FREEZE! I JUST HAD MY NAILS DONE!
How many people have to die before the country stops humoring feminists? Last week, a defendant in a rape case, Brian Nichols, wrested a gun from a female deputy in an Atlanta courthouse and went on a murderous rampage. Liberals have proffered every possible explanation for this breakdown in security except the giant elephant in the room — who undoubtedly has an eating disorder and would appreciate a little support vis-à-vis her negative body image.
The New York Times said the problem was not enough government spending on courthouse security (“Budgets Can Affect Safety Inside Many Courthouses”). Yes, it was tax-cuts-for-the-rich that somehow enabled a 200-pound former linebacker to take a gun from a 5-foot-tall grandmother.
Atlanta court officials dispensed with any spending issues the next time Nichols entered the courtroom when he was escorted by 17 guards and two police helicopters.
I think I have an idea that would save money and lives: Have large men escort violent criminals. Admittedly, this approach would risk another wave of nausea and vomiting by female professors at Harvard. But there are also advantages to not pretending women are as strong as men, such as fewer dead people. Even a female math professor at Harvard should be able to run the numbers on this one.
Of course, it’s suspiciously difficult to find any hard data about the performance of female cops.
Mostly what you find on Lexis-Nexis are news stories quoting police chiefs who have been browbeaten into submission, all uttering the identical mantra after every public safety disaster involving a girl cop. It seems that female officers compensate for a lack of strength with “other” abilities, such as cooperation, empathy and intuition.
There are lots of passing references to “studies” of uncertain provenance, but which always sound uncannily like a press release from the Feminist Majority Foundation.
The anonymous “studies” about female officers invariably demonstrate that women make excellent cops — even better cops than men! One such study cited an episode of “She’s the Sheriff,” starring Suzanne Somers.
A 1993 news article in the Los Angeles Times, for example, referred to a “study” — cited by an ACLU attorney — allegedly proving that “female officers are more effective at making arrests without employing force because they are better at de-escalating confrontations with suspects.” No, you can’t see the study or have the name of the organization that performed it, and why would you ask?
The U.S. Department of Justice regularly performs comprehensive surveys of state and local law enforcement agencies, collected in volumes called “Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics.”
The inestimable economist John Lott Jr. has looked at the actual data. (And I’ll give you the citation! John R. Lott Jr., “Does a Helping Hand Put Others at Risk? Affirmative Action, Police Departments and Crime,” Economic Inquiry, April 1, 2000.)
It turns out that, far from “de-escalating force” through their superior listening skills, female law enforcement officers vastly are more likely to shoot civilians than their male counterparts.
Unable to use intermediate force, like a bop on the nose, female officers quickly go to fatal force. According to Lott’s analysis, each 1 percent increase in the number of white female officers in a police force increases the number of shootings of civilians by 2.7 percent.
Adding males to a police force decreases the number of civilians accidentally shot by police. Adding black males decreases civilian shootings by police even more. By contrast, adding white female officers increases accidental shootings.
In addition to accidentally shooting people, female law enforcement officers are also more likely to be assaulted than male officers — as the whole country saw in Atlanta last week. Lott says: “Increasing the number of female officers by 1 percentage point appears to increase the number of assaults on police by 15 percent to 19 percent.”
In addition to the obvious explanations for why female cops are more likely to be assaulted and to accidentally shoot people — such as that our society encourages girls to play with dolls — there is also the fact that women are smaller and weaker than men.
In a study of public safety officers — not even the general population — female officers were found to have 32 percent to 56 percent less upper body strength and 18 percent to 45 percent less lower body strength than male officers — although their outfits were 43 percent more coordinated. (Here’s the cite! Frank J. Landy, “Alternatives to Chronological Age in Determining Standards of Suitability for Public Safety Jobs,” Technical Report, Vol. 1, Jan. 31, 1992.)
Another study I’ve devised involves asking a woman to open a jar of pickles.
There is also the telling fact that feminists demand that strength tests be watered down so that women can pass them. Feminists simultaneously demand that no one suggest women are not as strong as men and then turn around and demand that all the strength tests be changed. It’s one thing to waste everyone’s time by allowing women to try out for police and fire departments under the same tests given to men. It’s quite another to demand that the tests be brawned-down so no one ever has to tell female Harvard professors that women aren’t as strong as men.
Acknowledging reality wouldn’t be all bad for women. For one thing, they won’t have to confront violent felons on methamphetamine. (3-16-¬05)
How many people have to die before the country stops humoring feminists? Last week, a defendant in a rape case, Brian Nichols, wrested a gun from a female deputy in an Atlanta courthouse and went on a murderous rampage. Liberals have proffered every possible explanation for this breakdown in security except the giant elephant in the room — who undoubtedly has an eating disorder and would appreciate a little support vis-à-vis her negative body image.
The New York Times said the problem was not enough government spending on courthouse security (“Budgets Can Affect Safety Inside Many Courthouses”). Yes, it was tax-cuts-for-the-rich that somehow enabled a 200-pound former linebacker to take a gun from a 5-foot-tall grandmother.
Atlanta court officials dispensed with any spending issues the next time Nichols entered the courtroom when he was escorted by 17 guards and two police helicopters.
I think I have an idea that would save money and lives: Have large men escort violent criminals. Admittedly, this approach would risk another wave of nausea and vomiting by female professors at Harvard. But there are also advantages to not pretending women are as strong as men, such as fewer dead people. Even a female math professor at Harvard should be able to run the numbers on this one.
Of course, it’s suspiciously difficult to find any hard data about the performance of female cops.
Mostly what you find on Lexis-Nexis are news stories quoting police chiefs who have been browbeaten into submission, all uttering the identical mantra after every public safety disaster involving a girl cop. It seems that female officers compensate for a lack of strength with “other” abilities, such as cooperation, empathy and intuition.
There are lots of passing references to “studies” of uncertain provenance, but which always sound uncannily like a press release from the Feminist Majority Foundation.
The anonymous “studies” about female officers invariably demonstrate that women make excellent cops — even better cops than men! One such study cited an episode of “She’s the Sheriff,” starring Suzanne Somers.
A 1993 news article in the Los Angeles Times, for example, referred to a “study” — cited by an ACLU attorney — allegedly proving that “female officers are more effective at making arrests without employing force because they are better at de-escalating confrontations with suspects.” No, you can’t see the study or have the name of the organization that performed it, and why would you ask?
The U.S. Department of Justice regularly performs comprehensive surveys of state and local law enforcement agencies, collected in volumes called “Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics.”
The inestimable economist John Lott Jr. has looked at the actual data. (And I’ll give you the citation! John R. Lott Jr., “Does a Helping Hand Put Others at Risk? Affirmative Action, Police Departments and Crime,” Economic Inquiry, April 1, 2000.)
It turns out that, far from “de-escalating force” through their superior listening skills, female law enforcement officers vastly are more likely to shoot civilians than their male counterparts.
Unable to use intermediate force, like a bop on the nose, female officers quickly go to fatal force. According to Lott’s analysis, each 1 percent increase in the number of white female officers in a police force increases the number of shootings of civilians by 2.7 percent.
Adding males to a police force decreases the number of civilians accidentally shot by police. Adding black males decreases civilian shootings by police even more. By contrast, adding white female officers increases accidental shootings.
In addition to accidentally shooting people, female law enforcement officers are also more likely to be assaulted than male officers — as the whole country saw in Atlanta last week. Lott says: “Increasing the number of female officers by 1 percentage point appears to increase the number of assaults on police by 15 percent to 19 percent.”
In addition to the obvious explanations for why female cops are more likely to be assaulted and to accidentally shoot people — such as that our society encourages girls to play with dolls — there is also the fact that women are smaller and weaker than men.
In a study of public safety officers — not even the general population — female officers were found to have 32 percent to 56 percent less upper body strength and 18 percent to 45 percent less lower body strength than male officers — although their outfits were 43 percent more coordinated. (Here’s the cite! Frank J. Landy, “Alternatives to Chronological Age in Determining Standards of Suitability for Public Safety Jobs,” Technical Report, Vol. 1, Jan. 31, 1992.)
Another study I’ve devised involves asking a woman to open a jar of pickles.
There is also the telling fact that feminists demand that strength tests be watered down so that women can pass them. Feminists simultaneously demand that no one suggest women are not as strong as men and then turn around and demand that all the strength tests be changed. It’s one thing to waste everyone’s time by allowing women to try out for police and fire departments under the same tests given to men. It’s quite another to demand that the tests be brawned-down so no one ever has to tell female Harvard professors that women aren’t as strong as men.
Acknowledging reality wouldn’t be all bad for women. For one thing, they won’t have to confront violent felons on methamphetamine. (3-16-¬05)
(FB post by Jon Quinn)
No comments:
Post a Comment